<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bubba On Fox News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://leftwingconspiracy.com/2007/11/11/bubba-on-fox-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://leftwingconspiracy.com/2007/11/11/bubba-on-fox-news/</link>
	<description>Because Simply Disliking Republicans Isn't Enough</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 20:16:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://leftwingconspiracy.com/2007/11/11/bubba-on-fox-news/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 00:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leftwingconspiracy.com/2007/11/11/bubba-on-fox-news/#comment-67</guid>
		<description>the message was &quot;almost lost???&quot;  puh-leeze.  why use &quot;eloquently&quot; if you thought so.  his message was perfectly clear, and he had plenty of reasons to be indignant.  especially 7 years after his presidency, after trillions of dollars ill-spent with no results.

&quot;do better next time???&quot;  are you kidding?  Do you honestly think Cheney, GW, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, or any of those goons will ever do half as well as Clinton did here?  even on a right-wing channel, they come across as half-wits?

i&#039;d choose the Rhodes Scholar over the C-student windshield cowboy any day of the week.  especially with a future Nobel laureate as VP.

fiegn &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; feign</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the message was &#8220;almost lost???&#8221;  puh-leeze.  why use &#8220;eloquently&#8221; if you thought so.  his message was perfectly clear, and he had plenty of reasons to be indignant.  especially 7 years after his presidency, after trillions of dollars ill-spent with no results.</p>
<p>&#8220;do better next time???&#8221;  are you kidding?  Do you honestly think Cheney, GW, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, or any of those goons will ever do half as well as Clinton did here?  even on a right-wing channel, they come across as half-wits?</p>
<p>i&#8217;d choose the Rhodes Scholar over the C-student windshield cowboy any day of the week.  especially with a future Nobel laureate as VP.</p>
<p>fiegn &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; feign</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://leftwingconspiracy.com/2007/11/11/bubba-on-fox-news/comment-page-1/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 18:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leftwingconspiracy.com/2007/11/11/bubba-on-fox-news/#comment-65</guid>
		<description>GET &#039;er DONE &gt;&gt; BUBBA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GET &#8216;er DONE &gt;&gt; BUBBA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Accused righteous winger</title>
		<link>http://leftwingconspiracy.com/2007/11/11/bubba-on-fox-news/comment-page-1/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>Accused righteous winger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 15:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leftwingconspiracy.com/2007/11/11/bubba-on-fox-news/#comment-63</guid>
		<description>President Clinton finally answered the question elequently and completely. It&#039;s unfortunate that he allowed the message to almost be lost in his rant against Wallace. It would have been so much better if he could have restrained his outburst to a more appropriate forum.

He had to know the right wing questions were going to be asked- to fiegn righteous indignation in being asked questions he knew were going to be asked is below him. I believe he also crossed the line by personally attacking Wallace, who is paid to ask the questions- he stops short of saying Wallace was personally behind the &quot;blatant attack&quot; on him.

I surely hope you do better next time Mr. President- I usually enjoy your oratory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Clinton finally answered the question elequently and completely. It&#8217;s unfortunate that he allowed the message to almost be lost in his rant against Wallace. It would have been so much better if he could have restrained his outburst to a more appropriate forum.</p>
<p>He had to know the right wing questions were going to be asked- to fiegn righteous indignation in being asked questions he knew were going to be asked is below him. I believe he also crossed the line by personally attacking Wallace, who is paid to ask the questions- he stops short of saying Wallace was personally behind the &#8220;blatant attack&#8221; on him.</p>
<p>I surely hope you do better next time Mr. President- I usually enjoy your oratory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

